|
De-mystifying the vaccine for Coronavirus
by Hagiorite Monk Paul
|
| Orthodox Outlet for Dogmatic Enquiries | Science |
|
De-mystifying the vaccine for Coronavirus
by Hagiorite Monk Paul
|
|
It is with sorrow and wonder that
we are observing an event unprecedented in world history [1]. In
the name of “love” for the elderly and the more vulnerable,
vaccination is being scheduled for all people worldwide, in
order to exterminate the implacable “invisible enemy”, known as
Corona virus SARS-Cov2 (COVID19):
- A necessary legal framework that
will abolish the right to individual choice and will “defend”
the benefit-right to public health (Law 4675/2020 for Greece)
[2]
-An
accompanying governmental authoritarianism to enforce it
-Creating
demand and expectation for the vaccine (terrorism-brainwashing
by the media with the dilemma of “vaccination, or social
incarceration-isolation”)
-Unilateral
funding for the production of the vaccine, for controls by
clinical trials, for mass-production in vast quantities and for
delivery to every corner of the planet - at the expense of
research for finding and producing specialized antiviral drugs.
These are just some of the steps in
the protocol already being implemented in order to reach this
milestone event. Businessmen, journalists, government officials,
and international NGOs are almost daily propagating the vaccine
like a magic wand that will supposedly allow humanity to return
to the pre-COVID era. On the other hand, instead of the
scientific community (with the exception of an excessively
projected, vaccine-obsessed elite), stigmatizing this
misinformation, it has been keeping a “fishy silence” about what
people should really expect from the vaccine, with the exception
of a few inspired instances, such as Professor Dr. Yannis
Ioannidis [3]. In fact, this specific “pandemic” anything BUT
justifies worldwide vaccination. Let's see why:
1. The particularly low mortality
rate of the disease, but also its distribution by age, clearly
denote that vaccination, whenever it becomes feasible, must be
targeted. This percentage is fictitiously over-evaluated for the
time being (~2.5%) : on the one hand, due to the
over-representation of severely positive cases of the virus [4],
and on the other, given that the death toll from COVID has also
included the deaths of cases found positive for COVID but with
other, underlying diseases (not the SARS respiratory syndrome)
[5]. Recent studies which have estimated the number of deaths in
relation to the actual number of people exposed to the virus –
based on serological tests (antibody tests) in a specific
geographical area – have determined that this percentage is of
the order of magnitude of seasonal flu (certainly <1%) [ 6].
It should be noted that even if the
epidemic returns, as is the case with influenza, the health
system will deal with it more effectively, as now there is
experience in managing the disease (more ICUs). Hence, mistakes
of “Italy’s kind” will not be repeated, leading to a further
reduction of the mortality rate. Based on the above, even if a
safe and effective vaccine is produced (something especially
difficult for corona viruses’ biology), it can be justified for
administering it only to high-risk groups, as is done with the
seasonal flu vaccine. Needless to say that it is not justified
for administering it to children - who are in their vast
majority asymptomatic, nor to people who have been exposed and
are immune to the virus (positive antibody test), given that
they already have what the vaccine would have given them.
2. Covid19 virus, as opposed to
influenza, mainly affects people in the third and fourth age
groups, where the phenomenon of immune senescence [7] occurs –
that is, the reduction in size, quality and duration of their
immune response-protection - which can occur, after being
vaccinated. In other words, the vaccine-induced active immunity
may not be capable of protecting the elderly, who are the par
excellence “target” of the corona virus; hence, the finding of
an anti-viral therapy should be a priority – assuming that the
protection of the elderly is in fact what is desired.
3. Related to the above, is that
with seriously ill patients, acute respiratory failure occurs
through an immuno-pathological mechanism (a “storm” producing
inflammatory cytokines and reducing CD4 and CD8 T-mediated
immune response [8]). There are serious concerns that
vaccination will exacerbate this immune complication in the
event of a subsequent viral infection and will consequently
worsen the patient's clinical course. A similar effect was
observed with the FeCoV coronavirus vaccine, which affects cats
and causes peritonitis. [9].
4. The logic of eradicating an
infectious disease through global vaccination, on the one hand
presupposes the existence of a very safe and very effective
vaccine, and on the other hand, most importantly that there be
no other hosts of the virus in the natural environment. That is,
man has to be the only species that can host the virus. This is
true of the polio virus, but it does not apply to the
coronavirus, because all research suggests that the virus
originated from bats. Unknown and controversial remains the
intermediate link (host?) which had transported it from the
bats' caves of Wuhan city. In any case, the disappearance of the
virus through global vaccination would only be temporary - in
other words, a terrible waste of resources, inasmuch as it could
transfer from its natural refuge (the bats or the intermediate
host) to the human population at any given moment, capably
mutated for bypassing the existing herd immunity and initiating
a new pandemic.
5. Coronaviruses, being RNA
viruses, mutate rapidly, gaining genetic and therefore antigenic
diversity. This diversity, especially for coronae, also
increases through RNA recombination, due to the particularly
inconsistent mode of transcription of viral RNAs. Two types have
already been identified for SARS-Cov2, S and L [11, 12]. It is
doubtful that a vaccine can provide both equal coverage for all
strains of the virus that emerge, as well as permanent
protection over time, hence underlining one more time the
importance and priority of finding anti-viral drugs against
coronavirus. It is quite likely, therefore, that over time, a
global vaccination evolve into regular global vaccinations.
Could this perhaps be the aim?
Perhaps the corona is the long-awaited pretext for launching the
universal transition to a hybrid human biology, where the human
body will be protected, strengthened and ultimately dependent on
platform technologies (genetic engineering, digital interfacing)
through regular vaccinations-updates. But why all the rush for a
vaccine that not only does not promise much, but is the cause
for concern in the scientific community, especially if it is
produced in a hurry and implemented en masse? Finally, do the
pharmaceutical industries serve man, or does the opposite apply?
The reality is that ~ 99% of people
infected with coronavirus survive. Emphasis (ie funding) should
be placed on how to target the 1% of those who don’t survive, in
spite of a host of pharmaceutical options (immuno-modulators,
monoclonal antibodies, RNA polymerase inhibitors, proteases,
etc.). Already, the first results from the form of
hydroxychloroquine-azathromycin [13] as well as from a
monoclonal antibody that targets the superficial glycoprotein S
of the virus [14] are very encouraging.
Of course, part of an anti-viral
strategy is also the development of a safe and effective
vaccine. However, as analyzed, its forced production (1 year
instead of at least 6 years) with so many gaps in the knowledge
of the biology of the corona is not indicated - much less its
mandatory mass implementation. It is a tragic scientific
forfeiture (if not absurdity) in the age of Molecular Biology -
whose aim is to provide Medicine with specialized (even
personalized) treatments minimizing any side effects – that
there is discussion solely about intervention in 100% of the
human population, in order to “protect” 1% of it from a flu-like
virus, with a suspicious pharmaceutical half-measure. Quite
simply, this is a WRONG approach, certified by the fact that for
so many years there has never been any global vaccination
against the flu virus - which would have been far more
plausible, inasmuch as it strikes all age groups.
Man, as a rational being with
critical thinking, has the ability to voluntarily choose
whatever is recommended by medicine and biotechnology in favor
of his health, while simultaneously undertaking the consequences
of those choices, given that interventions in the human body are
rarely without side-effects. Vaccines are not exempt of this
rule. [15] The choice of not being vaccinated does not endanger
public health, as long as it does not abolish another person's
right to receive the vaccine - and with it, any protection it
provides. It is therefore self-evident that the final
decision-responsibility for receiving a vaccine belongs to the
person being vaccinated, since he will necessarily have to live
with any complications that may arise. No eventual compensation
can restore irreversible damages to a person’s physical and
mental health. Consequently, that which is condemnable is every
kind of complaisance that criminalizes a person's stance towards
living in a body free of suspicious vaccines, and which
transforms societies from democratic, to herds of undecided and
expendable animals.
One can perceive from the
aforementioned that the law pertaining to compulsory vaccination
[2] and the related propaganda in favor of the vaccine – with
the Covid19 virus pretext - have no scientific origin and
reference. They do not defend but rather undermine the good of
public health, and they enable the monstrous financial interests
involved, as well as the obscure agenda of certain “big
brothers” with power-loving appetites. Finally, they militate
against the freedom of a person’s spirit and body. As such, they
should be retracted at a scientific, legal and mainly at a
spiritual level.
The clime in which these schemes
are developed and consolidated is fear. The Mass Media of
Intimidation carefully create and maintain this clime. Fear is a
mighty inner force of man; it can paralyze his will, but it can
even steel it. The question is in which direction a person
directs that fear. If he turns it towards God, the only One
worthy of being feared (Luke 4: 5), then he will receive
enlightenment in return, boldness and courage - according to His
words: “be of courage, for I have overcome the world” (John
6:33). If a person remains focused on the phobias of this age,
he will receive in return even more anxiety, confusion and
cowardice, according to the Psalm: “they cowered in fear, where
there was no fear” (Psalm 5: 5). The intentional persistence to
de-sanctify the Sacrament of Holy Communion is not by
coincidence; its purpose is to elicit and generate fear that
will support the myth of the vaccine - as is the case throughout
the ages, with all fictitious concoctions that lack any logical
grounds.
Every time there is mention of
saliva, spoons and the like - by those who have targeted Holy
Communion -the miracle comes to mind of the born blind man (John
9). The Lord, with a “sanitarily unacceptable” action, restored
the eyes of the blind man! He mixed His saliva (a means of
spreading viruses and bacteria) with soil (a source of millions
of germs) and “smeared” the clay mixture over the eye sockets of
the blind man (mucosal conjunctiva: a point of entry for germs
and the onset of infection). We are familiar with what ensued,
just as we know that no science is able to reproduce that
result. Quite simply, if it had taken place today, apart from
the Pharisees of that time, among Jesus’ accusers would also be
certain narrow-minded infectious disease specialists.
Hagiorite Monk Paul
1.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/TheOptimist/Articles/coronavirus-vaccine-development-gavi
|
Article published in English on: 11-4-2020.
Last update: 11-4-2020.
